Paul Iske on Brilliant Failures in Healthcare
- Watch Paul Iske's TEDxMasstricht video "Brilliant Failures in Healthcare."
Video Highlights:
- No progress without failures.
- In a world as complex and dynamic as ours, not everything is predictable.
- To find new ways for value creation, the approach of trial and error is sometimes the only way to make progress. However, often people are stimulated to reduce risk and to hide mistakes.
- Share your failures at the Institute of Brilliant Failures.
The Institute of Brilliant Failures Culture Checklist
The Institute of Brilliant Failures is in the process of developing a "Brilliant Failures Culture Checklist." Review the checklist and observe the simple relationship to principles of high reliability organizing. The checklist will be built "around the following three key organizational development themes related to a "Brilliant Failure Attitude:"
- Easing off the 'control button.' Control tends to suppress evolutionary, spontaneous processes. The windows of opportunity that arise are left unexplored with no option to capitalize on their potential. To counter this organizations need to examine where they could control less and navigate more.
- Encouraging the right type of risk taking. Many organizations, and employees, tend to play safe, to stay in their comfort zones. As a result they take implicitly or explicitly take at the low end of the risk-return trade off. To counter this organizations need to examine where, and what type of risk taking, they want to encourage.
- Recognizing the value of, and learning from, failure. Many organizations tend to either brush failure under the carpet or punish those responsible. In this respect the brilliant failure attitude is: 'there is no such thing as failure only feedback.' Organizations need to put processes in place to recognize the value of 'failure' and maximize the learning from this.
Brilliant Failures Case Studies
- Read the Institute's brilliant failures case study analyses. (Each follows a familiar format reminiscent of AARs. The identification of intent was the set-apart from the AAR standard four questions.)
No comments:
Post a Comment
********
The WFLDP seeks to build and support an online community in which wildland fire professionals can interact.
We invite respectful discussion; however, the realities of online culture is such that anonymous posts and posts from children under the age of 13 are not accepted.
All comments are monitored by our editorial staff for appropriateness in meeting the mission of the WFLDP prior to posting to the blog. We do not discriminate against any views, but we reserve the right not to post comments.
Individuals posting comments are fully responsible for everything that they submit.
Comments submitted after hours and on holidays/weekends will be reviewed as early as possible the next business day.
Our complete blog policy can be found at http://www.fireleadership.gov/committee/reports/Blog_Policy_Jan2010.pdf.
A yellow box will appear after you submit your comment notifying you that your comment will be reviewed.